Borger v. Polaris Industries Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Borger, et al., No. CV-23-08052-PCT-SMM 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Polaris Industries Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs Sherri and John Borger initiated this action by filing a complaint in state 16 court. Defendant Polaris Industries Inc. then removed the action to this Court, asserting 17 that the other listed Defendant—Plaintiffs’ son Foster Borger—was fraudulently joined to 18 defeat diversity jurisdiction. (Doc 1). Now before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to 19 Remand. (Doc.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.