Legal Opinion
Castro v. Simon
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 1, 2019No. 19-327-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19‐327‐cv Castro v. Simon UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Abbas v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Forest Park Pictures v. Universal Television Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Perry v. BlairAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.