State v. Dee

[¶ 1] Michael J. Dee appeals from the judgment of the District Court (Augusta, Sparaco, J.) finding that he committed the civil violation of possessing a useable amount of marijuana. See 22 M.R.S. § 2383(1)(A) (2011). We affirmed this judgment in an earlier memorandum of decision, State v. Dee, Mem-12-7 (Me. 2012), which Dee moved us to reconsider pursuant to M.R.App. P. 14(b). We do so and again affirm.

[¶ 2] Dee argues that Maine’s prohibition of the possession of marijuana unconstitutionally infringes on his right to due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States…