Bone v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentBeasley, Presiding Judge
I respectfully dissent. “The object of [the alternative requirements of physical contact or eyewitness to the occurrence] is to eliminate fictitious claims of a driver who, through his own negligence, causes injury to himself without the involvement of another vehicle, and then seeks recovery on the grounds that it was due to a fictitious hit-and-run driver with the resulting fraud being perpetrated against the insurance company.” State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Carlson, 130 Ga. App. 27, 29 (1) (202 SE2d 213) (1973). The legislative intent is to eliminate fraudulent claims of negligent drivers.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Insurance Co. of North America v. DorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hoffman v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- UNIVERSAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. LowerySupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.