Legal Opinion

Salas v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1893No. 110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Nueces. Tried below before Hon. J. C. Russell Upon a trial for burglary, appellant was found guilty, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. A statement of the facts is unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years, from which judgment he prosecutes this appeal.

It is shown by the record, that a day or two after the burglary is alleged to have been committed appellant and two others were arrested and brought before a justice of the peace for an examining trial. He was informed of the charge against him, of having burglarized the store house of George Hobbs on the 4th day of July, and cautioned and warned that any statement he made might be used against him; that he could…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  2. Williams and Gordon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Grimsinger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API