Legal Opinion
Suntharalinkam v. Keisler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 31, 2007No. 04-70258PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The order for publication filed October 18, 2007, is hereby withdrawn and replaced with the attached order for publication. The dissent remains as originally filed.
ORDER
The petitioner’s unopposed Motion to Withdraw his Petition for Review is GRANTED. The government requests that dismissal be conditioned on vacatur of the panel opinion, which we agree is appropriate in the circumstances of this case. FRAP 42(b). The government also requests that the dismissal be conditioned on an award of court costs, which we decline to do. Therefore, the Petition for Review is DISMISSED. The panel…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ramon Alvarado v. Corporate Cleaning Services, ICourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Astrazeneca AB v. United Food & Commercial Workers UnionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- In re RudrakumaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Vasquez-De Martinez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- In re: Nexium Antitrust v.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.