Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Ludeling

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 1879PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bradley

This case, like Parsons v. Jackson (supra, p. 484), arises out of the supplementary proceedings which took place in the case of Jackson et als. v. The Vicksburg, Shreveport, & Texas Rail*514road Co. (reported as Jackson v. Ludeling in 21 Wall. 616), after our decision therein. In pursuance of the mandate in that case, the Circuit Court for the District of Louisiana made a further decree on the twenty-second day of March, 1875, containing, amongst other things, the following directions, that is to say: -

“ 2. It is further adjudged and decreed that the writ of injunction directed by the decree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. LudelingSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Gibson v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  3. Cannon v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861
  4. Jenkins v. GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
  5. Fleytas v. PoutzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1862

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mason v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Loos v. . WilkinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Nabors Oil & Gas Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  4. Heirs of Wood v. NichollsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  5. New Orleans, Spanish Fort & Lake Railroad v. DelamoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API