Legal Opinion

Charles and Charlene Baker v. F & F Investment Company, Federal Housing Administration

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 21, 1973No. 72-2036PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.

In their complaint, the Negro plaintiffs alleged that they were charged excessive and discriminatory prices for their homes. Their suit was based on asserted violations of the Fifth, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments and the Civil Rights Acts (42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1985(3)). In view of District of Columbia v. Carter, 409 U.S. 418, 93 S.Ct. 602, 34 L.Ed.2d 613, plaintiffs no longer rely on the Fourteenth Amendment or 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Jurisdiction was predicated on 28 U.S. C. § 1343(4). The pertinent provisions are reproduced in the Appendix hereto. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Blessing v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Park Ridge, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Beard v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. City of Milwaukee v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API