Strauss v. Steiner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
From an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendants from picketing the plaintiffs’ place of business, and granting a cross-motion by the defendants to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, the plaintiffs appeal. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to *726plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Stuhmer & Co. v. Korman, 252 App. Div. 878; Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co., 303 U. S. 323.) Certain of the statements used by those picketing the plaintiffs’ premises were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Strauss v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- George F. Stuhmer & Co. v. KormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lifshitz v. StraughnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941