Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Steiner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

From an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction pendente lite to restrain the defendants from picketing the plaintiffs’ place of business, and granting a cross-motion by the defendants to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint, the plaintiffs appeal. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to *726plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. (Stuhmer & Co. v. Korman, 252 App. Div. 878; Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co., 303 U. S. 323.) Certain of the statements used by those picketing the plaintiffs’ premises were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Strauss v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. George F. Stuhmer & Co. v. KormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lifshitz v. StraughnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API