State v. Mauck
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
Defendant appeals judgments revoking his probation. Defendant argues the trial court did not comply with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(a). As we conclude the trial court complied with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(a), we affirm.
I. Background
On or about 20 October 2003, in Haywood County, defendant pled guilty to, inter alia, selling or delivering a schédule two controlled substance and possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine (“drug convictions”). The file number on defendant’s judgment was 03CRS3703. Defendant received a suspended sentence requiring supervised probation for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- In Re STPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- State v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. GormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020