Legal Opinion

State v. Mauck

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 2010No. COA09-1042PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Defendant appeals judgments revoking his probation. Defendant argues the trial court did not comply with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(a). As we conclude the trial court complied with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1344(a), we affirm.

I. Background

On or about 20 October 2003, in Haywood County, defendant pled guilty to, inter alia, selling or delivering a schédule two controlled substance and possession with intent to sell or deliver cocaine (“drug convictions”). The file number on defendant’s judgment was 03CRS3703. Defendant received a suspended sentence requiring supervised probation for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. In Re STPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. BrinkleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
  3. State v. GormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. OsborneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API