McGahan v. Crawford
Supreme Court of South Carolina
The following are the pleadings: The above named plaintiffs, complaining, by way of amended complaint, for themselves and all other creditors of the defendants, D. R. & W. R. Crawford, who will join in and bear their pro rata share of the expense of this suit, allege: 1st.-That, at the time hereinafter mentioned, Edwin Bates, Thomas R. McGahan, and Charles K. Bates were partners in trade, doing business under the style and firm name of Edwin Bates & Company, and that on the…
Read the full summary
The following are the pleadings: The above named plaintiffs, complaining, by way of amended complaint, for themselves and all other creditors of the defendants, D. R. & W. R. Crawford, who will join in and bear their pro rata share of the expense of this suit, allege: 1st.-That, at the time hereinafter mentioned, Edwin Bates, Thomas R. McGahan, and Charles K. Bates were partners in trade, doing business under the style and firm name of Edwin Bates & Company, and that on the day of , 18 , the said Edwin Bates departed this life, leaving the said plaintiffs, Thomas R. McGahan and Charles K.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
In January, 1885, the defendants, D. R. & W. R. Crawford, being in debt to the plaintiffs and others, transferred and conveyed to their sister and codefendant, Miss D. M. Crawford, certain real and personal property. On the 20th day of December, 1890, plaintiffs commenced an action to set aside these transfers and conveyances, on the ground, first, of actual fraud, and, second, as in violation of the assignment act of this State. To the complaint, as a part thereof, was attached a list of the property alleged to have been conveyed and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AbelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Llewellyn v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- R. E. Allen, Bro. & Co. v. BurnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912