Peregoy v. Mckissick
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
—There is the same fault in the entitling of this appeal as that noticed in case No. 12441, ante, p. 568. It should be entitled McKissick v. Peregoy.
This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining the defendant from interfering with a head-dam by means of which the plaintiff diverts water from a stream which flows in its natural course through the defendant’s lands. This head-dam and connecting ditch were constructed by plaintiff on the land now owned by defendant while the title thereto remained in the government, and they have been used to divert the water of the stream to lands belonging to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Nevada Ditch Co. v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
- Barrows v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Anderson v. BassmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1905
- Hewitt v. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.