Legal Opinion

Holy Angels Academy v. Hartford Insurance Group

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Julian F. Kubiniec, J.

Defendant, Hartford Insurance Group, by notice of motion seeks summary judgment declaring, as a matter of law, that specific exclusions in the multiperil policy of liability insurance issued to plaintiff, Holy Angels Academy, operate to deny coverage to plaintiff. Plaintiff cross-moves for similar relief finding defendant to be obligated to provide insurance coverage.

Plaintiff’s underlying complaint seeks recovery for property damage to plaintiff’s school and convent buildings resulting from extensive cracking and separation of walls and ceilings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Sincoff v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Wyatt v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co. of SeattleDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
  4. Barash v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Powell v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Murray v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fayad v. Clarendon Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Kula v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. West v. Umialik Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API