Legal Opinion
State v. Neely
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 5, 1968No. 52645PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant James Neely was charged, tried and convicted of breaking and entering in violation of section 708.8, Codes 1962, 1966, and has appealed. We affirm.
Defendant’s two assigned errors are that his motion to suppress and objections to testimony based on an alleged unreasonable search and seizure should have been sustained and the evidence was insufficient to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice as required hy Code section 782.5.
About 10 p. m., January 21, 1966, Mr. and Mrs. Homer Shaw discovered the front door of Barton Abarr’s Phillips 66 service station in the town…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Daniel Bozza, Charles Mulhearn, Ronald Jones, Michael Pizzo, Salvatore Guarnieri, Anthony Delutro, A/K/A Tony WestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- William Spinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Commonwealth v. RaymondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Alejandrino Diaz-Rosendo and Felix Anenson Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. BakkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State v. KramerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. SchlaterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.