Legal Opinion

Froedge v. Walden

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

The sole question presented is whether a writ of prohibition should issue against a circuit judge to prevent him from enforcing an order directing a litigant to disclose information made in a patent application. The Court of Appeals denied the writ. We reverse.

In May of 1980 Southern Explosives Corporation filed a suit in the Barren Circuit Court alleging ownership of certain patent rights applied for by Froedge, and claiming various damages. In the course of the litigation, Southern Explosives, through discovery, attempted to compel Froedge to produce the patent application…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. PaxtonKentucky Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt Health Care Corp. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Schmitt Furniture Co. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Triple Elkhorn Mining Co. v. AndersonKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt Health Care Corp. v. TrudeKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API