Legal Opinion

Langensiepen v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1982No. Appeal, No. 1969 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

Jane M. Langensiepen (claimant) appeals here from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) which reversed a referee’s decision and held that due to her willful misconduct, she was not entitled to benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.1

The claimant had been employed as a salesperson by Queen’s Nutritional, a health food store, for approximately six months. She was discharged for taking a bag of dried soup2 for her own use, without paying for it. Although he had no written policy, the employer testified that he had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. BaconCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Gladkowski v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Palmer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Carl v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API