Legal Opinion

Goodman v. . Commissioners of Person

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1928Published

1Per curiam

The bonds in question are issued in accordance with the provisions of the County Finance Act and in conformity with the provisions thereof. The findings of fact made by the trial judge and supported by evidence fully support and justify the judgment approving both bond issues. No practical purpose would be served by citation and discussion of authorities. The law is clear and well settled. Hartsfield v. Craven County, 194 N. C., 358, 139 S. E., 698; Hall v. Commissioners, 194 N. C., 768, 140 S. E., 739; Mayo v. Commissioners, ante, 15; Commissioners v. Spitzer, 173 N. C., 147, 91 S. E., 707.

Af…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. Commissioners of Duplin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Sidney Spitzer & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Hartsfield v. . Craven CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API