American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Village of Arlington Heights
Illinois Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Bilandic
As the sole survivor of the old majority (AT&T v. Village of Arlington Heights (December 4, 1992), No. 72315), it is incumbent upon me to respond. (Justices Clark, Moran and Cunningham retired in December 1992.) The three-member old minority did not suffer any attrition. With the addition of two new members to their ranks, the old minority has been transformed into the new majority. I hasten to add my congratulations and respectful dissent.
The new majority opinion is substantially the same as the old dissent. The few changes did not, in my judgment, rehabilitate a fatally flawed argument.
There…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.