Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Village of Arlington Heights

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1993No. 72315Published

1DissentJustice Bilandic

As the sole survivor of the old majority (AT&T v. Village of Arlington Heights (December 4, 1992), No. 72315), it is incumbent upon me to respond. (Justices Clark, Moran and Cunningham retired in December 1992.) The three-member old minority did not suffer any attrition. With the addition of two new members to their ranks, the old minority has been transformed into the new majority. I hasten to add my congratulations and respectful dissent.

The new majority opinion is substantially the same as the old dissent. The few changes did not, in my judgment, rehabilitate a fatally flawed argument.

There…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API