Legal Opinion

Wantroba v. Rusch

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 7, 1977No. 77-416PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The question presented here is whether Raymond Wantroba, the plaintiff, was a member of the police department of the Village of Justice or an auxiliary policeman. A member of the police department is entitled to the protection afforded by the Illinois Municipal Code, section 10—2.1—17 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 24, par. 10—2.1—17) which provides in part:

° 0 [N]o officer or member of the fire or police department # # shall be removed or discharged except for cause, upon written charges, and after an opportunity to be heard in his own defense.”

An auxiliary policeman has no such rights. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Bubash v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. Kagann v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Nowak v. City of Calumet CityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API