Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Acron

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 16, 2004No. 52877-7-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ellington, A.C. J.

Felonies for which the legislature has assigned no seriousness level ranking have a standard sentencing range of 0 to 12 months. Michael Acron was convicted of an unranked offense. His sentence was based upon the seriousness level established for another crime. We reverse and remand for resentencing.

FACTS

Michael Acron was charged with two counts of indecent liberties under RCW 9A.44.100(l)(d), which is the section pertaining to an offense by a health care provider against a patient. Acron entered an Alfordl1 plea to both counts. The trial court calculated a standard range…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Goldsmith v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Anita Khandelwal v. Seattle Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. In Re BradyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of BradyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API