Legal Opinion

Goppman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2004PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge JIULIANTE.

Michael E. Goppman (Claimant) petitions for review of a September 11, 2008 order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that affirmed the decision of the referee denying Claimant Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation benefits (TEUC). 1 We affirm.

On May 30, 2003, the Department of Labor and Industry (Department) disapproved Claimant’s application for airline-related TEUC benefits. Claimant appealed to the referee, who affirmed the Department’s determination based on the following findings of fact. 2

Claimant was employed by Absolute…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Owoc v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Fekos Enterprises v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Zimmerman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stugart v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Clark v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Egreczky v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Hempfling v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Jacobs v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API