Salisbury v. Stenmoe
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Bergit Stenmoe from a judgment of the district court for Polk county, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Watts, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
Action to determine adverse claims to the northeast ¼ of section 30, town 153, range 49. The only question before the court is wheth*468er the tax title, through which appellant claims, is valid. The title is assailed upon the ground that the amount of taxes and penalty appearing in the published delinquent list, as follows, was indefinite and insufficient :
Township of Northland.
Town 153, Range 49.
No. Tax &
Sec. A’r’s. ■ P’n’ltv
Jolianson Ralfson, ne¼ 30 160 21 065
No decimal point was used to designate dollars and cents, but the dollar mark was prefixed to the amount opposite the first description,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chouteau v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Doherty v. Real Estate Title Insurance & Trust Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Mahlum v. ThayerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904