Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nishan Singh v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 21, 2017No. 11-72259Unpublished

1DissentKleinfeld, Senior Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would deny the petition for review. The record supported the BIA’s determination that there was no clear error in the immigration judge’s conclusion that Singh lacked credibility.

*898The majority evidently would extend Singh v. Gonzales to the dissimilar circumstances in this case.1 There, the asylum officer did not testify to confirm his notes.2 Here, he did. There, his notes were only a “short, conclusory summary,”3 here, his notes were extensive and detailed. Indeed, the testimony of the asylum officer is very comparable to situations where doctors testify and when…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jarnail Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API