Legal Opinion

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Bonneville Power Administration

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 23, 2007No. 06-70430, 06-71182PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOULD, Circuit Judge.

Salmon and steelhead 1 are two of the great natural resources of the Columbia River. Their continued existence has been threatened by the construction of dams to capture a third great natural resource of the Columbia River, its water power. As these dams were constructed, the number of salmon and steelhead migrating up the Columbia River to reproduce at its headwaters dropped. At one time, an estimated ten to sixteen million adult fish returned to the Columbia River basin each year. Today, only about one million fish return for spawning that is essential to the species’…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Modesto Irrigation District v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association, Northwest Power and Conservation Council, Intervenor v. Bonneville Power Administration, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Indian Nation v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API