Real Estate Investment Company's Assigned Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 80, Jan. T., 1906, by William J. Murphy, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1900, No. 140, dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report in Assigned Estate of the Real Estate Investment Company. Exceptions to report of Sheldon Potter, Esq., auditor. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stewart,
This case requires little more than a brief statement of facts. Appellant claimed that there was due him from the Real Estate Investment Company $26,459.92 for work and material furnished by him, in connection with the construction and erection of what is known as the Lincoln Apartment House in the city of Philadelphia. The company disputed the claim, alleging that there was included in it a large amount properly chargeable to the account of other buildings for which it was not responsible. A settlement was effected and reduced to writing. The writing recites…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re Enoch Vincent's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
- Spencer v. Carlisle BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916