State v. Davenport
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentWeimer, J.
IU am compelled to dissent. In this instance, what compels this dissent are the clauses prohibiting double jeopardy contained in our most fundamental laws, the United States Constitution and the Louisiana Constitution.1 These double jeopardy clauses serve, in part, to protect a citizen from being tried twice for the same offense.
The majority of this court mixes an analysis of the authority of courts under state law with an analysis of the protections of the federal Constitution and concludes that the federal protections against double jeopardy do not apply to the defendant. The reason the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.