Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Kenan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 10, 1944No. 90PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question before us is whether $25,-867.31 paid in the year 1940 by the respondents as trustees under the will of Mary Lily (Flagler) Bingham were “ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year for the production or collection of income, or for the management, conservation, or maintenance of property held for the production of income” and thus deductible in computing income tax under Section 23 (a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Act of 1942, 26 U.S.C.AJnt.Rev.Code, § 23(a) (2), which amended Section 23(a) by adding subdivision (2),…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Kenan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. Hord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Higgins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Baer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Farris v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  3. Baer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  4. Farris v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  5. Fayen v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API