Legal Opinion

State v. Tuscaloosa County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 18, 1937No. 6 Div. 87PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

This is a proceeding by the State of Alabama v. Tuscaloosa County, Ala., et al., under the declaratory judgment statute (Gen. Acts 1935, p. 777) to determine whether the county is under legal obligation to reimburse the State for the expenses incurred in auditing the accounts, books, and records of the county superintendent of education and the county treasurer of school funds of Tuscaloosa County. The audit was made February 18 to March 30, 1935, covering a three-year period (July 1, 1929, to June 30, 1932) of the records examined. •

Admittedly, the governing statute, to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kimmons v. Jefferson County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Dean v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Petree v. McMurraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Allred v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lee v. MacOn County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1967
  2. Sims v. Etowah County Bd. of Ed.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Hawkins v. State Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API