Storz & Iler v. Finklestein
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J. See opinion for reference to authorities.
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, C.
This action was brought by the plaintiff in error, a partnership firm engaged in the manufacture of beer, to.recover of defendant the sum of $707.06, the price of certain beer alleged to have been furnished by plaintiff to defendant in the month of June, 1889. By way of counter-claim the defendant alleged that the beer was furnished him by plaintiff under a written agreement which required that the plaintiff should furnish the license necessary under the laws of Nebraska; .that plaintiff had neglected to provide this license, and that in consequence of such neglect the defendant had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tracy v. . TalmageNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Hull v. . RugglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Madison Avenue Baptist Church v. Baptist Church in Oliver StreetNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Aiken v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
- United States Express Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McManus v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Iams v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1917
- Storz v. FinklesteinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Mitchell v. BranhamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Becker v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.