St. Elizabeth's Hosp v. Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Levine, J.
After receiving complaints regarding Dr. BB., a physician licensed to practice medicine in this State, respondent duly issued and served upon petitioner an investigative, office subpoena duces tecum requiring production of all of petitioner’s records "relating to quality assurance review of records reflecting care and treatment rendered by [Dr. BB.] to patients at [petitioner hospital]”. Petitioner thereafter moved to quash the subpoena on the grounds that it was overbroad and unduly burdensome and because compulsory production of all quality assurance records…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capital Newspapers v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Levin v. MurawskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Levin v. GuestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Albany Medical Center Hospital v. DenisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Lenard v. New York University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Armenia v. Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Mental Hygiene Legal Service v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Atkins v. GuestNew York Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.