Kaplan v. Goldman
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff sold his stock of automobile accessories to defendant on a written agreement which contained the following stipulation:
“Second party (defendant) assumes and agrees to pay Pennsylvania Tire Company’s account not to exceed $1,000.”
At the time of the sale plaintiff appears to have been indebted to the Pennsylvania Tire Company for merchandise, in the sum of nine hundred and six ($906) dollars, for which two trade acceptances had been given by him. When the trade acceptances became due they were not paid by defendant in accordance with the agreement. In consequence of this the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kruce v. Lakeside Biscuit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farley v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- LaBour v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926