Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Goldman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1923No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff sold his stock of automobile accessories to defendant on a written agreement which contained the following stipulation:

“Second party (defendant) assumes and agrees to pay Pennsylvania Tire Company’s account not to exceed $1,000.”

At the time of the sale plaintiff appears to have been indebted to the Pennsylvania Tire Company for merchandise, in the sum of nine hundred and six ($906) dollars, for which two trade acceptances had been given by him. When the trade acceptances became due they were not paid by defendant in accordance with the agreement. In consequence of this the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kruce v. Lakeside Biscuit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farley v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. LaBour v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Fellows v. National Can Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API