Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sarno v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1964No. 40546Published

1DissentNichols, Presiding Judge

The plaintiff alleges as acts of negligence: “16. The defendant knew, or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known, that said shower and bathtub were unsafe for use by their paying guests. 17. The defendant knew, or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known, that the water was too hot and that the pressure and flow of the water was uneven, and that the bathing facilities provided were not safe for use by guests. 18. The defendant knew, or in the exercise of ordinary care should have known, that the temperature of the water was too high for bathing, and the failure on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lee v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Thornton v. HardinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API