Legal Opinion

Banahan v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 18, 1928No. 28749Published

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The facts leading up to this litigation are briefly and correctly stated in the opinion of this court in Banahan v. Hughes. Sheriff, et al., 158 La. 648, 104 So. 486. Eor convenience, the statement is reproduced here, viz.:

“The defendants have appealed from a-judgment annulling a sale of the plaintiff’s homestead.
“Plaintiff’s husband, Frank C. Banahan, mortgaged. the homestead to one Doll to secure a loan of $1,000. Mrs. Banahan was not a party to the transaction and there was no waiver of the homestead exemption. Doll foreclosed his mortgage by executory proceedings, and the homestead was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Draiss v. PayneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Banahan v. SvarvaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Banahan v. HughesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API