Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Brooks
Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)
Decided December 31, 2002No. 10-02-209-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REX D. DAVIS, Chief Justice.
Eric Arthur Brooks filed a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus alleging that his arrest was based solely on racial profiling without probable cause or reasonable suspicion. The trial court denied Brooks’s application, finding that it is “without merit.” Brooks appealed.
Brooks contends that the court abused its discretion because it did not dispose of his habeas application in a prompt fashion and because the court did not employ the methods provided for determining a racial profiling claim in the recently-enacted article 2.132 of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte HargettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Ex Parte HargettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Ex Parte Garrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- Few v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Ernst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Ernst v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
- Ex Parte Kimberly Jones v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2026
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.