Rampil v. State

BOARDMAN, Acting Chief Judge.

We affirm the judgments and sentences on each and every count against each appellant, all of the issues raised by appellants being without merit.

Only one subissue merits discussion. Appellants challenge the validity of a wiretap on the telephone of three of appellants on several grounds, one of which is that the St. Petersburg police, who conducted the wiretap, were acting beyond their jurisdiction, since the tap was operated in Largo.

However, the lead investigative officer involved, St. Petersburg Detective Martin, testified without contradiction that he was also…