Legal Opinion

Nunnally v. Shockley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 1, 1955No. 35303PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The petition does not show that the defendants had parted with possession of any part of their building. Hence, the defendants’ alleged liability is simply that of owners or occupiers of land to an invitee for “failure to exercise ordinary care in keeping the premises and approaches safe.” Code § 105-401. The petition alleges facts sufficient to raise a jury question as to whether the defendants breached their duty, to the plaintiff’s injury, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition.

2. The evidence presents a case differing from that alleged. It appears that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stack v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Crossgrove v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  3. Ocean Steamship Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Shattles v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  5. Echols v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nunnally v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Yates v. CrumbleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Shockley v. NunnallyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Nunnally v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Shockley v. NunnallyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API