Legal Opinion
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 1983No. 83 Civ. 1939 (MEL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
On March 8, 1983 defendant Odyssey Partners (“Odyssey”), a shareholder of Trans World Corporation (“Trans World”), served on Trans World a demand for a list of Trans World’s stockholders. After waiting for a response to the demand for the five-day period required under Delaware law, 1 Odyssey filed suit in the Delaware Chancery Court on March 14, 1983, seeking an order directing Trans World to furnish Odyssey with the requested stockholder list. On March 11, 1983 Trans World instituted the present action, alleging violations of various provisions of federal securities…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. BarbashCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- ConAgra, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
- Rabbani v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Long Island Lighting Company v. Maurice BarbashCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984