Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hoffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 13, 1931Published

1Per curiam

The complaint does not directly or by inference disclose that the compromise agreement between plaintiff and the legatees of Cora B. Hoffman was in anywise concerned with the oral contract upon which the present action is based. The complaint explicitly alleges that the consideration given by the legatees and received by the plaintiff was for “ the withdrawal of bis objections and the consent to probate.” It nowhere appears that it was given and received for a settlement and cancellation of plaintiff’s alleged claim under the oral contract.

The withdrawal of the objections and the consent to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phalen v. . United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Kine v. FarrellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. McCallum v. PickensNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API