Legal Opinion

B. Zatinsky & Son, Inc. v. Louis L. Schwartz & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1925Published

1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.

In this action, tried before the court without a jury, the plaintiff corporation seeks to recover from, the defendant *214corporation and from the individual defendant, as guarantor, a balance claimed to be due under' a written contract between the plaintiff and the defendants, made July 25, 1923. The defense, in substance, is to the effect that the agreement was illegal and without legal consideration, and cannot be enforced because it arose out of a prior illegal and secret agreement between the defendant corporation and its creditors, the plaintiff’s assignors, as partners, in fraud of all the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ettlinger v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. White v. . KuntzNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Hanover National Bank v. BlakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Jacobs v. . FensterstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. New Howard Mfg. Co. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API