Legal Opinion
Boag v. Farmers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 28, 2003No. 28180-5-IIPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
Kathleen Boag appeals from the trial court’s order granting Farmers Insurance Company of Washington’s motion for summary judgment and denying her motion for partial summary judgment. She argues that her insurance policy with Farmers conflicts with statutory requirements and that the court incorrectly interpreted the contract. We agree, reverse, and remand.
FACTS
On April 30, 1999, Boag was injured in a motor vehicle collision. At the time of the accident, Farmers provided Boag’s automobile insurance.
The insurance contract provided for personal injury protection (PIP):
2. Income Continuation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Harmon v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Boag v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- McAndrews Group, Ltd. v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.