Legal Opinion

The Asiatic Prince

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 3, 1901No. 51PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Iliis cause comes here upon appeal from a, decree of the district court, Southern district of New York (97 Red. 343), dismissing a libel to recover damages for the alleged nondelivery of certain merchandise shipped on the Asiatic Prince from New York in December, 1895, and January, 189(5, to ihe port of Santos, in Brazil.

1Opinion of the Court

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The merchandise consisted of flour, kerosene, bacon, and lard, of the invoiced price of £6,499.1.8, which had been ordered by Belmarco & Co., merchants of Santos, who were also agents of the Prince Line — of which the Asiatic Prince was one —at that port. The plaintiff and Belmarco & Co. had had many business transactions prior to the one in question, and as a result of them the latter firm was, as libelant claims, indebted to him to a considerable amount. Bills of lading for this merchandise were issued to the libelant, reciting that the goods were to be delivered at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. A. Klipstein & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
  2. Tan Hi v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  3. Compania Transcontinental De Petroleo v. Mexican Gulf Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Biddle v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Parsons v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API