Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. Norris
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Sherman R. Norris from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Lewis, J., denying his motion to set aside the judgment and for leave to answer and defend.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This was an action to foreclose a real-estate mortgage made by the defendant-and his wife to the plaintiff on their' homestead. Personal service was made on the defendant Emma Norris on October 14, 1892; and the summons and complaint were served on the defendant Sherman R. Norris at Lester Park, in the county of St. Louis, in this state, on October 28, 1892, by leaving a copy of the same at the house of his usual abode with his codefendant and wife, Emma Norris, a person of- suitable age and discretion then resident therein. His wife employed a lawyer to defend the action for him, who…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Keller v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Bausman v. TilleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Lee v. MacfeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rosa v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Berryhill v. SeppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheek Bank v. RidpathWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Lovin v. HicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Grant v. LawrenceUtah Supreme Court · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.