Legal Opinion

Bank of Cleveland v. Ward

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1841Published

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is a motion, filed by the plaintiff, to change the venue, in this case, from the county of Cuyahoga to the county of Greauga, for trial. The reason on which it is sought to sustain this motion is, that the cause of action has been so long and so publicly discussed, and has become so much a subject of general interest in the county' of Cuyahoga, that a fair and impartial trial can not be bad therein.

In support of this motion, the affidavit of Zalmon Fitch, president of the bank, is submitted. He deposes that a fair and impartial trial can not be had in Guy ahoga county, as he verily…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowman v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1829

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API