Legal Opinion

Noyes v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1879PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Action brought in this court upon three several causes of action, the nature of which will sufficiently appear from the opinion. The attorney general demurred to each count of the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryaít, C. J.

I. The first count of the complaint is upon a judgment in this court, in favor of one Morrill, for costs in the supreme court of the United States, assigned to the plaintiff. A criminal prosecution was instituted by the state against Morrill, for violation of ch. 72 of 1870. He was convicted, and brought the case by writ of error to this court, where the conviction was affirmed. Morrill v. The State, 38 Wis., 428. He then took his writ of error to the supreme court of the United States, which reversed the judgment on a federal question. The judgment of reversal awarded costs…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bank of the Commonwealth v. . the MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Morrill v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Atwell v. ZeluffMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Kellogg v. Supervisors of Winnebago CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Monroe Water Works Co. v. City of MonroeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Keller v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Two Rivers Manufacturing Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API