Legal Opinion

Goellner v. Kemp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 1997No. Nos. 96-03636, 96-04382PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellants challenge the trial court’s failure to award them damages in this breach of contract action. They also contend that the trial court erred in failing to award them attorney’s fees and costs. We agree that the appellants should have been awarded damages after the trial court determined that the appellees had breached the parties’ mortgage agreement. Accordingly, we remand to the trial court with directions that it enter a money judgment for the appellants based on the evidence presented at trial.

We also reverse the trial court’s denial of fees and costs. In view of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moritz v. Hoyt Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Prosperi v. Code, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. KCIN, INC. v. Canpro Investments, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ppi, Inc. v. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel WagringDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API