Legal Opinion · Dissent

McMinn v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1982No. 82-20Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

In my opinion, this is a very arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable decision rendered by the Board of Directors. I am disappointed that the majority does not recognize that the appellants are quite obviously being given unequal treatment of the law by the city of Little Rock, Arkansas. Originally, the appellants acquired this property which was clasified “A-l” family. The ordinance in effect allowed “A-l” family district and “B residence” district to be used among other things for "public schools, elementary and high, and other educational institutions with curriculum equivalent to a public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. City of Little Rock v. Infant-Toddler Montessori School, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API