Legal Opinion

Pickford v. Smith

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 15, 1932No. 41239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

— Appellánt originally commenced an action at law for the recovery of specific personal property. The property sought to be recovered was three promissory notes, one of which has been eliminated by the parties and is not involved on this appeal. The ground upon which recovery of the notes was sought was fraud in their inception, want and failure of consideration. Issue was joined on the original petition. After the cause had been assigned for trial but before the trial was commenced, appellant filed an amended and substituted petition setting up fraud in the inception of the notes, the want…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Biermann v. Guaranty Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Smith v. BrokerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Barnes v. Hekla Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  4. P. Cox Shoe Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  5. City Deposit Bank v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. White v. WilkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. Whalen v. RingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Mobley v. Boyt Farms Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. White v. WilkesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API