Legal Opinion

Visayan Refining Co. v. Standard Transp. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 10, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THACHER, District Judge.

The motion is to remand the ease to the state court, from which it was removed by defendants on the grounds that the suit arises under the Constitution and laws of the United States and the complaint discloses a separable controversy wholly between citizens of different states. The jurisdictional amount is involved.

In the first cause of action the complaint alleges that in June, 1917, defendants entered into an agreement with plaintiff to transport, during the years 1917 and 1918, all of the cocoanut oil manufactured by the plaintiff from the Philippine Islands to San…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Roberts v. . ElyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Arkansas v. Kansas & Texas Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  5. Mountain View Mining & Milling Co. v. McFaddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Santa Margarita Mutual Water Co. v. State Water Rights Board of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  2. Delaware, L. & W. R. v. SlocumDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1944
  3. Smith v. Voss Oil Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1958
  4. Rand v. Hercules Powder Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  5. Hudler v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API