Legal Opinion

Ransom v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1919No. 9752Published

Conviction tor manslaughter; from Dooly superior court—Judge Crum. April 23, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. In the motion for a new trial it is complained that the court erred in admitting in evidence certain dying declarations, the objections urged being that “there was not sufficient foundation laid for the admission of a dying statement, because the State has failed to prove that the deceased was in a dying condition and because the statement is hearsay.” There is no merit in the objection that “the state*365ment is hearsay.” That “dying declarations constitute one of the exceptions to the rule which rejects hearsay evidence” is clearly announced in Mitchell v. State, 71 Ga. 128 (2). The ground…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Haynie v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API