Legal Opinion

Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Butz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 21, 1975No. C-74-1976 WHOPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ORRICK, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Prune Bargaining Association — an organization representing 217 of the approximately 2,500 producers of California prunes — and numerous individual prune growers, seek to permanently enjoin defendants Earl Butz, the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, and several prune handlers from enforcing certain pro visions of regulations promulgated by the Secretary under the authority delegated him by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937 (“the Act”) (7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.). This Court denied plaintiffs’ motion for a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Zuber v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Port of Boston Marine Terminal Assn. v. Rederiaktiebolaget TransatlanticSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lion Raisins, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. HarrisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  3. Evans v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Berning v. GoodingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1986
  5. Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. BerglandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API